In Montana, our state legislature is grappling with the idea that they should require applicants to prove proficiency in the English language before getting a driver’s license.

I don’t think they need to be too proficient, just learn a few key words to get them to the store and back.

At the top of the list is the word “Stop.” Maybe throw in “Yield.” Learning numbers might not be a bad idea either. A few other key words are “Slow Children Playing” and maybe even “Rest Area Ahead.” “Exit” is always a good word to know because you don’t want to get stuck on the Interstate and not be able to get off. We won’t go into the McDonalds, Burger King or Taco Bell words. Maybe those key words could be counted as extra credit?

The story also noted that the Montana Department of Justice gives 200 to 300 tests a year in different languages. These folks are also allowed to have an interpreter with them during the exam. An interpreter?

What about other folks who have reading problems? Maybe they could bring a Title I Reading teacher with them? As many 15 and 16 year-olds have shown us, when there’s something on the line, like getting their driver’s license, they become very studious and proficient in taking tests and reading.

A simple solution to the problem would be to administer the written test without an interpreter. If you cannot read and comprehend the written test and pass it, then you do not get your license.

See, it’s simple and easy. Why can’t the Montana Legislature think in these terms?